Vanissa C. v. U.S. Commissioner (W.D. La. Aug. 22, 2022) - onset date, mental RFC, subjective complaints
            
              Regular price
              
              
                
                  $75.00
                
                Sale
              
            
          
Vanissa C. v. U.S. Commissioner, Case No. 3:21-cv-04454-TAD-KDM (W.D. La. Aug. 22, 2022) (Order by District Judge Terry A. Doughty)
Briefs for purchase: Appellant’s Social Security Brief, Motion to Remand, and Judgment granting Motion to Remand
Topics addressed:
- RFC - relationship with PRTF findings
 - RFC - interacting with co-workers, supervisors and the public
 - Subjective symptoms - improper focus on objective evidence
 - Subjective symptoms - regulatory factors
 - Establishing onset
 - Mental domains - interacting with others
 
Rulings addressed:
- 
Social Security Ruling 85-15
 - 
Social Security Ruling 96-8p
 - 
Social Security Ruling 96-9p
 - 
Social Security Ruling 18-01p
 
Issues briefed:
1) The ALJ’s determination of Plaintiff’s disability onset date is not linked to substantial evidence and violates SSR 18-01p.
2) The ALJ’s mental residual functional capacity finding is deficient.
3) Plaintiff’s subjective complaints and testimony were not properly considered by the ALJ.
Court decision:
After Plaintiff briefed the merits, the Commissioner chose not to defend the ALJ’s decision and instead, sought a voluntary remand. The parties negotiated the remand terms and the court remanded for further proceedings.