Skip to content
Submit
Close search
Sarah Bohr Publications
Home
Books
Winning Federal Court Briefs
Contact
Submit
Search
Log in
Cart
Home
Books
Winning Federal Court Briefs
Contact
Products
Filter
Filter
77 products
Sort
Sort
Featured
Best Selling
Alphabetically, Z-A
Price, low to high
Price, high to low
Date, new to old
Date, old to new
Winning Appeals Council Arguments 2025 Edition (Digital Download & Hard Copy)
$350.00
Winning Appeals Council Arguments 2025 Edition (Digital Download Only)
$295.00
Winning Arguments with Rulings - 2025 Edition (Digital Download & Hard Copy)
$260.00
Winning Arguments with Rulings - 2025 Edition (Digital Download Only)
$215.00
[Alicia S.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2023) - new AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, other work, subjective complaints
$75.00
[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand
$75.00
[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job
$75.00
[Antonio F.] v. Kijakazi(S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022) - failure to consider mild mental limitations in assessing RFC, new evidence submitted to the AC, subjective complaints
$75.00
Previous
Page 7 of 10
Next
![[Alicia S.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2023) - new AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, other work, subjective complaints](//sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_a74a439d-15f8-4bd7-ae98-3d11af64f59d_250x250@2x.jpg?v=1716418334)
![[Alicia S.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2023) - new AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, other work, subjective complaints](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_a74a439d-15f8-4bd7-ae98-3d11af64f59d_{width}x.jpg?v=1716418334)
![[Alicia S.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2023) - new AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, other work, subjective complaints](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_a74a439d-15f8-4bd7-ae98-3d11af64f59d_250x250@2x.jpg?v=1716418334)
![[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_2d000ff1-b222-4c16-b617-3861e33c5449_{width}x.webp?v=1753464283)
![[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_2d000ff1-b222-4c16-b617-3861e33c5449_250x250@2x.webp?v=1753464283)
![[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_e81ea1d4-c5dd-48f0-9942-e534191fbea4_{width}x.webp?v=1716415869)
![[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_e81ea1d4-c5dd-48f0-9942-e534191fbea4_250x250@2x.webp?v=1716415869)
![[Antonio F.] v. Kijakazi(S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022) - failure to consider mild mental limitations in assessing RFC, new evidence submitted to the AC, subjective complaints](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_e595491d-e46e-4895-b3ae-c9975afad986_{width}x.jpg?v=1716419124)
![[Antonio F.] v. Kijakazi(S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022) - failure to consider mild mental limitations in assessing RFC, new evidence submitted to the AC, subjective complaints](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_e595491d-e46e-4895-b3ae-c9975afad986_250x250@2x.jpg?v=1716419124)