Brief & decision
Helen K. v. Kijakazi
C.D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023
In this download
- The brief or briefs as filed with the court
- The court’s written decision
- Searchable PDF, formatted for printing
Written and filed by Sarah H. Bohr
Delivered by email the moment you order
Federal court brief
Helen K. v. Kijakazi
C.D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023
Cognitive impairment, failure to include credited opinion, lay evidence
$75
One-time purchase · instant download
- Won in the court listed above — the arguments that worked, as filed
- Adapt the structure and authorities to your own case
- No subscription, no account required
About this case
Topics addressed:
-
Specific impairments - stroke
-
Specific impairments - cognitive limitations
-
RFC - failure to include credited opinions
-
Medical opinions (new law) - persuasiveness
-
RFC - relationship with PRTF findings
-
RFC - need for special supervision
-
RFC - lay evidence
-
Subjective complaints - failure to take medications
- Subjective complaints - daily activities
Rulings addressed:
-
Social Security Ruling 96-8p
-
Social Security Ruling 16-3p
-
Social Security Ruling 18-3p
Issues Briefed:
1) Whether the ALJ properly considered the evidence from Dr. Williamson, whose opinions the ALJ found “persuasive.”
2) Whether the ALJ’s mental RFC assessment is supported by substantial evidence.
3) Whether the ALJ properly considered the lay evidence of record in assessing Plaintiff’s RFC.
4) Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s subjective complaints.
Court decision:
After full briefing, the court remanded for further proceedings.