![[Jose A.] v. Comm’r of Soc. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2023) (EAJA Order) - substantial justification, awarding $13,327.33 in EAJA fees](http://sarahbohrpublications.com/cdn/shop/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_35dd85a9-7b8d-4f65-8774-313d23d28706_{width}x.jpg?v=1716416524)
[Jose A.] v. Comm’r of Soc. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2023) (EAJA Order) - substantial justification, awarding $13,327.33 in EAJA fees
Regular price
$75.00
Sale
[Jose A.] v. Comm’r of Soc., No. 6:21-CV-1909-EJK, 2023 WL 5352308 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2023) (Decision by U.S. Magistrate Judge Embrey J. Kidd, by consent)
Briefs Included: Memorandum in Support of Petition for Attorney Fees; Plaintiff’s EAJA Reply; and court order
Topics addressed:
-
EAJA - substantial justification
- EAJA - hourly rate
-
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - pre-filing time
-
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - briefing time
-
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - pre-filing time
- EAJA - reasonableness of hours - Total time
-
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - EAJA time
Rulings cited: none
Issues briefed:
1) Whether the government’s position was substantially justified such that no fees should be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
2) Whether the fees sought under the EAJA are excessive.
Court decision:
The court held that the Commissioner’s position was not substantially justified and found that spending 57.35 was reasonable. Thus, the court awarded EAJA fees of $13,327.33.