Louis S. v. Dudek

D.N.J. Apr. 9, 2025

Definition of medical source, need to address medical opinions, medium work RFC, RFC - ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, subjective symptoms

$75

One-time purchase · instant download

Won in the court listed above — the arguments that worked, as filed
Adapt the structure and authorities to your own case
No subscription, no account required

About this case

Louis S. v. Dudek, No. 2:24-CV-08107-MEF (D.N.J. Apr. 9, 2025) (Decision by U.S. District Judge Michael E. Farbiarz)

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and remand order

Topics addressed:

Definition of a medical source opinion
Medical opinions – need to address
RFC – medium work
RFC – reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants
RFC – lack of support for findings
RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record
Subjective symptoms – mischaracterization of record
Harmless error

Rulings addressed:

Social Security Ruling 83-10
Social Security Ruling 96-8p

Issues briefed:

1) The ALJ committed reversible error in failing to address the assessment of PT McIntosh.

2) The ALJ’s finding that Louis S. can perform the exertional demands of medium work is not supported by substantial evidence.

3) The RFC finding is the product of a lay evaluation and is not supported by substantial evidence.

4) The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting Louis S.’s subjective complaints are not supported by substantial evidence.

Court decision:

After Plaintiff briefed the merits, the Commissioner chose not to defend the ALJ’s decision and instead, sought a voluntary remand. The parties negotiated the remand terms and the court remanded for further proceedings.