Brief & decision
MLR v. O’Malley
C.D. Ca. Jan. 31, 2025
In this download
- The brief or briefs as filed with the court
- The court’s written decision
- Searchable PDF, formatted for printing
Written and filed by Sarah H. Bohr
Delivered by email the moment you order
Federal court brief
MLR v. O’Malley
C.D. Ca. Jan. 31, 2025
Lay witness evidence, RFC – failure to include credited opinions, mental RFC, subjective symptoms
$75
One-time purchase · instant download
- Won in the court listed above — the arguments that worked, as filed
- Adapt the structure and authorities to your own case
- No subscription, no account required
About this case
MLR v. O’Malley, No. 2:24-cv-01119-MRW (C.D. Ca. Jan. 31, 2025) (Opinion and Order by U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani)
Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Opening Brief, Plaintiff’s Reply Brief, and court decision
Topics addressed:
-
RFC – failure to include credited opinions
-
RFC – relationship with PRTF findings
-
RFC – concentration, persistence and pace
-
Testimony of lay witnesses
-
Subjective symptoms – daily activities
-
Subjective symptoms – treatment regimen
-
Testimony of lay witnesses
-
Harmless error
Rulings addressed: none
Issues briefed:
1) The ALJ failed to properly address the lay evidence from MLR’s mother, as directed by the Appeals Council.
2) The ALJ’s mental RFC assessment is not supported by substantial evidence.
3) The ALJ failed to properly evaluate MLR’s subjective complaints.
Court decision:
After full briefing, the court issued an opinion and remanded for further proceedings.