Nikita M. v. O’Malley

D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024

Interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands

$75

One-time purchase · instant download

Won in the court listed above — the arguments that worked, as filed
Adapt the structure and authorities to your own case
No subscription, no account required

About this case

Nikita M. v. O’Malley, No. 2:23-CV-10722 (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) (Order by U.S. Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King)

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and remand order

Topics addressed:

RFC – interacting with co-workers, supervisors and the public
Medical opinions - supportability
Medical opinions - articulation requirements
Testimony of lay witnesses
Subjective symptoms - regulatory factors
Subjective symptoms - required finding
Mental domains - interacting with others
Sentence 6 remands due to new evidence

Rulings addressed:

Social Security Ruling 96-8p
Social Security Ruling 96-9p
Social Security Ruling 16-3p

Issues briefed:

1) The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting the opinions from Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Ajanaku-Makun, Plaintiff’s treating mental health provider, are not based on substantial evidence.

2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors.

3) The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting Plaintiff’s subjective complaints are not supported by substantial evidence.

4) The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting the lay evidence of record are not supported by substantial evidence.

5) The Court should remand pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in light of new and material evidence.

Court decision:
After Plaintiff briefed the merits, the Commissioner chose not to defend the ALJ’s decision and instead, sought a voluntary remand. The parties negotiated the remand terms and the court remanded for further proceedings.