Brief & decision

[Tonya L.] v. Kijakazi

S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2023

In this download

  • The brief or briefs as filed with the court
  • The court’s written decision
  • Searchable PDF, formatted for printing

Written and filed by Sarah H. Bohr

Delivered by email the moment you order

‹ Eleventh Circuit Briefs - MD FL & SD FL

Federal court brief

[Tonya L.] v. Kijakazi

S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2023

Medical opinions, RFC, subjective symptoms

$75

One-time purchase · instant download

  • Won in the court listed above — the arguments that worked, as filed
  • Adapt the structure and authorities to your own case
  • No subscription, no account required

About this case

[Tonya L.] v. Kijakazi, No. 22-CV-61236, 2023 WL 2562649 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, No. 22-61236-CIV, 2023 WL 2560903 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2023) (R&R by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss, adopted by Chief U.S. District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga)

Briefs for purchase:  Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment  and Plaintiff's Reply Brief  

Topics addressed: 

  • Establishing onset  

  • RFC - assistive device

  • RFC - required findings

  • RFC - ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his or her conclusion

  • Medical opinions - required findings

  • Subjective symptoms - ALJ must consider reasons for not seeking treatment 
  • ALJ mischaracterization of the record
  • Post hoc justification

    Rulings addressed:

    • Social Security Ruling 83-10

    • Social Security Ruling 96-8p

    • Social Security Ruling 16-3p

    • Social Security Ruling 18-01p

    Issues briefed:

    1)  The ALJ failed to comply with 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520b, 416.920b in evaluating the report of Dr. Adam, a consultative physician.

    2) The ALJ’s RFC assessment for the period from the alleged onset date of March 23, 2018, to August 3, 2020, the established onset date, is not supported by substantial evidence.

    3) The ALJ’s stated reasons for discrediting Plaintiff’s testimony for the period prior to August 3, 2020, are not based on substantial evidence.

    Court decision:

    After full briefing, a Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending remand, which was adopted in full by the district court.